Home Services Method Pricing Work About Insights Get a content audit

Home / Editorial Standards

Editorial standards.

How we research, write, review, update and correct everything we publish for clients and for ourselves.

  • Qualified authorsWriters are matched to topics by first-hand experience.
  • Primary sourcesClaims link to original research, filings or data.
  • Two-pass editingStructural edit, then line edit and fact-check.
  • Credentialed reviewFinance, legal and health topics reviewed by qualified experts.
  • Scheduled updatesEvery article reviewed at least once a year.
  • Open correctionsErrors fixed and noted with the date.

Authors and reviewers

Every article carries a named author with a bio describing relevant experience. Articles on money, legal or health topics also name a reviewer with the relevant credential. We do not publish under fake personas.

Sourcing

We prefer primary sources: government data, academic research, company filings and direct interviews. Secondary sources are used for context and are cited as such. We do not cite AI-generated summaries as sources.

Independence

Client content clearly identifies the client as publisher. Comparison pages disclose the publisher's relationship to products mentioned and state how products were evaluated.

Updates

Articles show a published date and a last-updated date. Substantive changes include a short change note.

Corrections

If you spot an error, contact us. We review reports within two business days and note corrections at the end of the article.

Ranking claims

We do not promise or guarantee specific rankings or placements in search results or AI answers. Legal review required